Skip to main content
Hark logo

Member of Technical Staff, Pretraining Evaluations

Hark

San Jose, CAFull-time$180–450K/yrPosted todayStill listed today

Most applications go out cold — see where you stand first. No sign-up to start.

You apply on the employer's site, with no Olive account needed.

Watch jobs like this.

Don't just apply. Show up ready.

Olive works from this exact posting.

At a glance

Compensation
$180–450K/yr
Location
San Jose, CA
Schedule
Full-time
Work Authorization
Not specified

Olive lists jobs from US employers, including remote roles you can work from the United States.

Job overview

Hark’s Omni team builds multimodal foundation models and experiences across text, audio, and other modalities. The Member of Technical Staff will develop systems to evaluate models during pretraining and mid-training, track held-out loss and capabilities, and make comparisons across training runs reproducible. Evaluation analysis will help researchers choose training recipes and checkpoints and identify regressions.

Skills & qualifications

RequiredNice to have

Skills

Model Evaluation Systems, requiredReproducible Comparisons, requiredLanguage Model Evaluation, requiredLog-Likelihood Scoring, requiredGenerative Scoring, requiredPrompt Sensitivity, requiredFew-Shot Variance, requiredFormatting Effects, requiredStatistical Judgment, requiredUncertainty Estimation, requiredSample-Size Planning, requiredBenchmark Contamination Analysis, requiredBenchmark Saturation Analysis, requiredPython, requiredEvaluation Pipeline Engineering, requiredBenchmark Development, requiredHuman-Rated Benchmarks, nice to haveModel-Based Graders, nice to haveCapability Scaling, nice to haveCode Execution Sandboxes, nice to haveMath Verifiers, nice to havePretraining Evaluation, nice to haveMid-Training Evaluation, nice to haveMultimodal Evaluation, nice to haveConstrained Inference Evaluation, nice to have

Qualifications

Model Evaluation Systems Experience, requiredLanguage Model Evaluation Methods, requiredPython Engineering Experience, requiredBenchmark Development Record, requiredHuman-Rated Benchmark Experience, nice to haveCapability Scaling Experience, nice to haveCode Execution Sandbox Experience, nice to havePretraining Evaluation Experience, nice to haveMultimodal Evaluation Experience, nice to haveConstrained Inference Evaluation Experience, nice to have

Full job description

About Hark

Hark is an artificial intelligence company building advanced, personalized intelligence. One that is proactive, multimodal, and capable of interacting with the world through speech, text, vision, and persistent memory.

We're pairing that intelligence with next-generation hardware to create a universal interface between humans and machines. While today's AI largely operates through chat boxes and decade-old devices, Hark is focused on what comes next: agentic systems that interact naturally with people and the real world.

To get there, we're developing multimodal models and next-generation AI hardware together - designed from the ground up as a single, unified interface for a new era of intelligent systems.

About the Role

The Omni team at Hark is building the next generation of AI experiences beyond text, enabling models to understand and generate content across multiple modalities, including text, audio, and beyond. Our goal is to create seamless, real-time multimodal intelligence that powers intuitive and immersive user experiences.

As part of the Omni team, you will build the multimodal foundation models at the core of this effort. You'll build the systems used to evaluate Hark's models during pretraining and mid-training. You'll track held-out loss, measure capabilities across text and multimodal tasks, and make comparisons between training runs reproducible. Your analysis will help researchers choose training recipes, select checkpoints, and identify regressions.

Responsibilities

  • Build and maintain an evaluation harness for held-out loss, performance across data domains, and capabilities in text, code, math, and reasoning.

  • Design evaluations for early checkpoints and smaller models using log-likelihood scoring, few-shot prompts, and generated completions.

  • Assess benchmark coverage and saturation, quantify uncertainty in results, and work with data researchers to detect training-data contamination.

  • Version datasets, prompts, graders, and inference settings so results can be reproduced and compared across checkpoints and training runs.

  • Analyze experiments and work with researchers to identify useful recipe changes, select checkpoints, and prioritize capability improvements.

  • Develop new benchmarks for capabilities that existing evaluations do not adequately measure.

  • Extend evaluation tools to image, video, speech, and audio tasks in collaboration with multimodal researchers.

Requirements

  • Experience building model evaluation systems or experimental tools for reproducible comparisons across models or checkpoints.

  • Knowledge of language model evaluation methods, including log-likelihood and generative scoring, prompt sensitivity, few-shot variance, and formatting effects.

  • Strong statistical judgment, including uncertainty estimation, sample-size planning, and distinguishing statistical significance from practical improvements.

  • Experience identifying benchmark contamination, saturation, or gaps between benchmark scores and the intended capability.

  • Strong Python engineering skills, including building reliable evaluation pipelines that run efficiently across many checkpoints.

  • A record of developing useful benchmarks, evaluation methods, or tools that inform research and engineering decisions.

Bonus Qualifications

  • Experience designing benchmarks with human ratings or model-based graders.

  • Experience studying capability scaling or predicting larger-model performance from smaller experiments.

  • Experience with code execution sandboxes, math verifiers, or other programmatic graders.

  • Experience evaluating checkpoints during pretraining or mid-training.

  • Multimodal evaluation experience: audio, speech, vision, or interleaved inputs.

  • Experience evaluating model quality under constrained inference budgets.

Compensation

The US base salary range for this full-time position is between $180,000 - $450,000 annually.

The pay offered for this position may vary based on several individual factors, including job-related knowledge, skills, and experience. The total compensation package may also include additional components/benefits depending on the specific role. This information will be shared if an employment offer is extended.

How this job compares

Set against the 1,935 open Machine Learning jobs on Olive Jobs, counted November 10, 2026.

Pay
  • This posting$180–450K/yr
  • California median$193–286K/yr338 salary ranges
  • US median$155–251K/yr1,458 salary ranges

This range's midpoint, $315K, is 30% above the California median midpoint ($242K) — in the top quarter of Machine Learning salary ranges in California.

Openings
Olive Jobs lists 493 open Machine Learning jobs in California and 1,935 across the US. 8% of them nationwide are listed as remote or flexible.
Hiring the most in California
Experience
Machine Learning postings that state a minimum ask for 5 years of experience at the median; the middle half ask for 4 to 8 years (1,405 postings).
Education
715 of the 1,935 open Machine Learning jobs (37%) ask for a bachelor's degree or higher.

Counted across the open, public US postings on Olive Jobs on November 10, 2026. Pay medians are the middle values of the low ends and of the high ends of postings that list both ends of a range in the same cadence (a yearly salary or an hourly rate); a range's midpoint is halfway between its ends. Pay and experience figures resting on fewer than 20 postings are left out.

Prepare for this role

You've read the whole posting — now see how you match it.