
Staff Software Engineer (AI Evals)
Remote · USFull-time$100–200/hrPosted todayStill listed today
Most applications go out cold — see where you stand first. No sign-up to start.
Watch jobs like this. New remote roles like this one, by email.
Don't just apply. Show up ready.
Olive works from this exact posting.
At a glance
Olive lists jobs from US employers, including remote roles you can work from the United States.
Job overview
G2i is seeking a highly experienced software engineer to evaluate how AI coding agents perform in real-world scenarios. The role focuses on engineering judgment, the usefulness of explanations and reasoning, and whether interactions guide users effectively—not on writing production code. The engineer will provide direct feedback and help define quality standards for interactions with coding tools.
Skills & qualifications
Skills
Qualifications
Full job description
Staff Software Engineer (AI Evals)
Contract | $100–$200/hour | 20-40 hrs/week | Start ASAP
We’re looking for highly experienced software engineer to help evaluate the quality of interactions with modern coding agents such as OpenAI Codex and Claude Code. This is not a traditional engineering role. You won’t be writing production code. You’ll be evaluating something harder: whether the model thinks like a great engineer.
What This Role Actually Is You will assess how AI coding agents behave in real-world scenarios — focusing on:
-
Whether the response makes sense
-
Whether the preamble and reasoning are useful
-
Whether the output reflects strong engineering judgment
-
Whether the interaction feels right to an experienced developer
This role is about engineering taste — not syntax correctness.
What You’ll Be Doing
-
Evaluate AI-generated coding interactions end-to-end
-
Judge whether outputs are:
-
Useful
-
Correct (at a high level)
-
Aligned with how a strong engineer would think
-
Assess the quality of explanations and reasoning, not just code
-
Distinguish between different levels of response quality (e.g. what makes something a 2 vs 4)
-
Provide clear, opinionated feedback on:
-
What worked
-
What didn’t
-
What felt “off” or misleading
-
Help define what great looks like when interacting with tools like Cursor
What We Mean by “Taste” We’re specifically looking for engineers who can answer questions like:
-
Does this feel like something a strong engineer would actually say?
-
Is this explanation helpful, or just technically correct?
-
Is the model guiding the user well, or just dumping output?
-
Would this interaction build or erode trust?
You should be comfortable making subjective but rigorous judgments.
Who You Are
-
Staff / Principal-level engineer (or equivalent experience)
-
Strong background in one of the below:
-
Go
-
Python
-
Rust
-
TypeScript / JavaScript
-
Hands-on experience using:
-
OpenAI Codex
-
Claude Code
-
Cursor
-
Deep familiarity with modern AI-assisted dev workflows
-
Able to evaluate code without needing to fully execute or deeply review every line
-
Comfortable giving direct, opinionated feedback
-
High bar for what “good engineering” looks like
Nice to Have
-
Experience with tools like Cursor or similar AI-first IDEs
-
Prior exposure to prompt design or evaluation workflows
-
Experience mentoring senior engineers or defining engineering standards
Engagement Details
-
Rate: $100–$200/hour
-
Hours: ~20 hours+
-
Duration: Through October w/possible extentions
-
Start: ASAP
-
Process:
-
Take-home evaluation exercise
-
Background Check
-
Offer
Similar jobs, posted recently
Open roles like this one, listed in the last 30 days.
Staff Software Engineer, Auth/AccountsCoalition · Remote · US · $159–234K/yrPosted 2w agoPosted 2w ago
Staff Forward Deployed Engineer - Applied AI (Remote)Rula · Remote · US · $192–240K/yrPosted todayPosted today
Staff Software Engineer, AI GatewayDocker · Remote · US · $170–276K/yrPosted 5 days agoPosted 5 days ago
Staff Software Engineer, AI Developer ToolsDocker · Remote · US · $170–276K/yrPosted 6 days agoPosted 6 days ago
Sr. Staff Software Engineer, AI PlatformPinterest · Remote · US · $209–429K/yrPosted 2w agoPosted 2w ago
You've read the whole posting — now see how you match it.